A security solution can perform perfectly on a data sheet and still fall short when it's installed in an actual facility.
Existing cabling may be older than expected. Cable distances may exceed standard design limits. Electrical interference, environmental conditions, building construction, accessibility restrictions, and legacy infrastructure can all affect performance.
That is why MidChes believes an important question should be answered before a customer invests significant time and money in a new security solution:
Will it actually work in the customer’s environment?
To find out, MidChes frequently performs detailed Proof of Concept evaluations before a solution is engineered, specified, purchased, or deployed. These evaluations are conducted at no charge to the customer and often require the MidChes team to recreate the customer’s operating conditions as accurately as possible.
That can mean working in the heat or cold, in rain or snow, and testing equipment under conditions that go well beyond a controlled indoor demonstration.
For the MidChes team, a Proof of Concept is not simply about showing that a product turns on in a controlled environment. It's about determining whether the proposed solution can solve the customer’s specific problem.
During a recent Proof of Concept, the team evaluated whether existing coaxial cable could be reused to support modern IP security devices.
As Tom looked over the collection of tools, cables, meters, and testing equipment required for the evaluation, he joked that they had gathered everything they needed to “go back in time to analog.”
The customer’s question, however, was very current:
Could the existing analog infrastructure be modernized without replacing all of the cabling?
Many facilities still contain extensive runs of coaxial cable that were originally installed for analog video surveillance systems. Replacing that infrastructure with new Ethernet cable can be expensive, disruptive, and physically difficult.
Historic buildings may have restricted pathways. Conduits may be full or inaccessible. Some cable runs may pass through walls, ceilings, underground pathways, or operational areas where installing new cable would interfere with the facility.
In those situations, reusing existing coaxial cable to support IP devices could potentially save the customer substantial time, labor, and money.
But “potentially” is not enough.
The proposed solution had to be tested.
A basic product demonstration might connect a short piece of clean cable between two devices in a temperature-controlled, well lit room. That can confirm that the technology works under favorable conditions, but it does not necessarily prove that it will work in the field.
MidChes takes the evaluation further.
“We took the coax, terminated it, t-tapped it, connected various lengths of it, and tested it to the nth degree,” Tom explained.
The testing did not stop when the devices connected successfully.
The team also considered the conditions that could interfere with performance:
The team deliberately introduced additional strain and interference to determine where the technology’s limitations might be.
The goal was not to make the solution succeed.
The goal was to discover the truth before the customer committed to it.
A Proof of Concept is valuable whether the proposed solution passes or fails.
When the technology works, the customer gains evidence that the design is viable. Engineers and integrators can move forward with greater confidence, and the organization can make its investment with a clearer understanding of the expected results.
When the technology does not work, or only works under certain conditions, the customer learns that before equipment is purchased, installation labor is scheduled, or project deadlines are placed at risk.
That early discovery can prevent:
Specifications and product documentation remain important, but they cannot account for every condition inside every building.
A properly designed Proof of Concept helps close that gap.
Performing a meaningful evaluation requires more than technical knowledge. It requires time, equipment, preparation, and a willingness to work under the same conditions the customer faces.
As Tom explained, MidChes is prepared to “get our hands dirty.”
That may mean setting up equipment outside on a hot or cold day, recreating long cable runs, working around legacy infrastructure, introducing electrical interference, or assembling an environment that closely matches the customer’s facility or even performing the tests at the customer's site.
The weather doesn't always cooperate. The equipment may need to be tested in extreme temperatures or difficult locations. The answer may require more work than connecting two devices on a demonstration table.
MidChes does it because real-world conditions matter.
A solution intended for a correctional facility, school, transportation environment, historic property, government building, or other demanding application must be evaluated against the realities of that environment.
The customer shouldn't be the first to discover the solution’s limitations after the purchase order has been issued and equipment installed.
MidChes performs these Proof of Concept evaluations at no charge to the customer.
That is an important distinction.
The purpose is not to add another consulting fee to the project. It is to help customers, consultants, integrators, and technology partners make better decisions before too much time and money have been invested in a particular approach.
“Why is any of this important?” Brad asked.
“Because our customers ask,” Tom answered. “They need it.”
When a customer brings us a difficult technical question, the team doesn't simply forward a data sheet or offer an untested recommendation. MidChes looks for a practical way to evaluate the technology and produce a defensible answer.
If there's a need, the team works to find a way.
The value of a Proof of Concept can also extend beyond the project that originally prompted it.
Once the team has evaluated a technology across realistic distances, environmental conditions, cable types, and sources of interference, we can apply that knowledge to similar customer challenges.
As Tom noted, if MidChes performs the work for one customer, the team can tell future customers, with greater confidence, that the solution has already been tested ourselves.
That does not eliminate the need to evaluate the unique requirements of each project. It does, however, create a stronger foundation for future designs and recommendations.
Over time, this hands-on testing becomes part of MidChes’ collective technical knowledge. The team learns not only what a product is designed to do, but how it behaves when it encounters the variables present in an actual deployment.
Security projects involve too much money, labor, operational disruption, and organizational risk to rely entirely on assumptions.
Before a customer replaces infrastructure, commits to a system design, or purchases a new technology, MidChes works to prove that the proposed solution can perform as expected.
That may require coaxial cable, IP devices, specialized testing equipment, induced voltage, electrical noise, long cable runs, and a very hot day outside like the evaluation today.
It may require working in the cold, rain, or snow on the next evaluation.
Whatever the environment requires, MidChes is prepared to recreate it, test it, and identify the limitations before they become the customer’s problem.
Because the best time to determine whether a security solution will work is not after it has been purchased....it is before it has been engineered into the project.
Contact to set up your Proof of Concept...